Call For Business Enquiries : +91 9819 000 511 / +91 91670 58 000 / +91 9819 000 445

GST Adjudication Support – Personal Hearing Representation & Order Management | N D Savla & Associates
Home GST Services Adjudication Support
GST Adjudication

GST Adjudication Support
Personal Hearing Representation & Order Management

GST adjudication is the stage at which a show cause notice moves from a written reply into an oral hearing and a reasoned order — where the proper officer decides whether to confirm, modify, or drop the proposed demand, and where the safeguards of Section 75 of the CGST Act 2017 are tested in practice.

Part of our GST dispute practice: SCN Handling GST Assessment GST Appeal Indirect Tax Services

What Is Adjudication Under GST?

Adjudication under GST is the process by which a proper officer, after issuing a show cause notice, considers the taxpayer's reply, hears the matter in person, and passes a reasoned order determining the tax, interest, and penalty payable. It is a formal quasi-judicial step within the GST department, not a routine review — and it applies whether the show cause notice was issued under Section 73 or Section 74 of the CGST Act 2017.

At N D Savla & Associates, our qualified Chartered Accountants represent businesses through every stage of GST adjudication — from the notice of personal hearing right through to the final order and the choice of next step. Therefore, adjudication is where the proper officer actually decides whether to confirm, modify, or drop the proposed demand, and where the safeguards of Section 75 are tested in practice.

A strong reply is necessary, but it is rarely sufficient. Most cases turn at the personal hearing, where the issues are explained, evidence is walked through, and the adjudicating authority sees the matter for the first time as a connected story. Therefore, our practice treats adjudication as a distinct service line, sitting between SCN handling and appeal. Furthermore, the work connects with the wider indirect tax framework and the earlier assessment stage, so the hearing is anchored in the full record of the matter.

Where Adjudication Fits in the GST Cycle

Adjudication sits at a clear, defined point in the GST cycle — the last opportunity to settle a dispute before a binding first-level order is passed and the matter moves to appeal.

The Place of Adjudication in the GST Cycle

The matter typically begins with scrutiny or audit, escalates into a show cause notice, and enters adjudication once the reply is filed — the stage at which the issues are finally tested before a binding first-level order, after which the only remedy is rectification or appeal.

Who Is the Adjudicating Authority

Under Section 2(4) of the CGST Act 2017, the adjudicating authority is any authority authorised to pass an order under the Act — other than the Board, the First Appellate Authority, the Revisional Authority, and the GST Appellate Tribunal. The officer acts in a quasi-judicial role, so the hearing follows natural justice and the order must rest on the record before that officer.

Adjudication Sits Between the SCN and the Appeal

The order passed in adjudication, summarised in Form GST DRC-07, becomes the document an appeal is filed against. Hence, every weakness in the adjudication record carries forward, and every strength built into it pays back at the appeal stage.

Section 75 Safeguards in GST Adjudication

Section 75 of the CGST Act 2017 lays down the general provisions that govern every adjudication. The ten safeguards below protect a taxpayer through the process — and our team treats them as a working checklist from the request for hearing to the review of the order.

Section 75(4)

Opportunity of Personal Hearing

An opportunity of personal hearing must be granted where the taxpayer requests it in writing or where an adverse order is contemplated.

Section 75(5)

Maximum Three Adjournments

The adjudicating authority can grant a maximum of three adjournments on reasonable cause being shown.

Section 75(6)

Reasoned Order

The order must set out the relevant facts and the basis of the decision so that the reasoning is on the face of the record.

Section 75(7)

Demand Cannot Exceed the SCN

The tax, interest, and penalty confirmed cannot exceed the amount specified in the show cause notice.

Section 75(8)

Grounds Cannot Be Enlarged

Tax, interest, or penalty cannot be confirmed on grounds other than those specified in the show cause notice.

Section 75(10)

Limitation on the Order

If the order is not passed within the period prescribed in the section under which the notice was issued, the adjudication is deemed to be concluded.

Section 75(2)

Re-determination After Section 74 Is Set Aside

Where a Section 74 demand is held not to involve fraud or wilful misstatement, the matter can be re-determined under Section 73 within the prescribed period.

Section 75(3)

Fresh Order on Remand

Where a matter is remanded, a fresh order must be passed within the period prescribed by the Act.

Section 75(13)

Single Penalty for the Same Act

Where a penalty is levied under Section 73 or Section 74, no penalty for the same act can be levied under any other provision of the Act.

Section 75(11)

Self-Assessed Tax Excluded From Adjudication

Self-assessed tax shown in the returns is not subject to adjudication and is recoverable directly.

The Personal Hearing in GST Adjudication

The personal hearing is the single most important touchpoint in adjudication. Therefore, how it is requested, prepared for, and conducted often determines the shape of the final order.

The Notice of Personal Hearing

After the reply to the show cause notice is filed, the adjudicating authority issues a notice of personal hearing fixing the date and venue. Therefore, attending the hearing is not optional; an absent taxpayer effectively allows the matter to be decided on the written record alone. Hence, the hearing notice should be acknowledged promptly and the appearance organised well in advance.

What Happens at the Personal Hearing

At the personal hearing, the authorised representative explains the reply, walks through the supporting evidence, and answers the officer's questions on the facts and the law. Therefore, the hearing is not a re-reading of the written submission; it is the chance to translate it into a clear, connected explanation. Hence, our team always prepares the spokesperson on the issues, the evidence, and the questions the officer is likely to raise.

The Right to Adjournment Within Limits

Where genuine cause exists, an adjournment of the personal hearing can be sought from the adjudicating authority. Therefore, under Section 75(5) of the CGST Act 2017, a maximum of three adjournments can be granted on reasonable cause. Hence, while an adjournment can buy preparation time, it should be used carefully and not as a routine tool.

The Adjudication Order — What It Must Contain

Once the hearing concludes, the adjudicating authority passes a reasoned order, the summary of which is issued in Form GST DRC-07. Therefore, the order must set out the relevant facts, the issues, the contentions of both sides, and the basis of the decision, in line with Section 75(6) of the CGST Act 2017.

The order cannot enlarge the demand beyond the show cause notice or rest on grounds outside the notice, by virtue of Section 75(7) and Section 75(8). Hence, our team reviews each adjudication order line by line against these safeguards, because a defect on these points is a strong basis for rectification or appeal.

Step-by-Step GST Adjudication Support Process

Our team follows a structured eight-step methodology for every adjudication engagement. The sequence keeps the record review, hearing preparation, representation, and post-order work aligned from start to finish.

01

Reviewing the SCN, Reply, and Supporting Record

First, we review the show cause notice, the reply filed in Form GST DRC-06, and the supporting documentation. Hence, the engagement begins with full familiarity with the record as it stands.
02

Securing the Notice of Personal Hearing

Next, we track and acknowledge the notice of personal hearing and confirm the date, venue, and the officer before whom the matter will be heard. Therefore, the matter does not slip into an ex parte order through a missed notice.
03

Building the Hearing File and Issue Brief

Then, we build a hearing file containing the issue brief, the legal position, the reconciliation, and the supporting documents organised in the order in which they will be referred to. Hence, the matter can be presented as a connected story rather than a heap of papers.
04

Preparing the Spokesperson and the Rehearsal

Next, we prepare the spokesperson, anticipate the officer's questions, and rehearse the responses on the harder issues. Therefore, the hearing is approached with the same discipline as a formal oral argument.
05

Representing the Business at the Personal Hearing

Then, our team attends the personal hearing, explains the reply, and engages directly with the adjudicating authority. Hence, the case is put forward in person, with the written record as supporting documentation.
06

Filing Additional Written Submissions and Authorities

Next, where the hearing throws up new issues or where the officer asks for additional information, we file further written submissions, judicial precedents, and clarifications. Therefore, the record is completed before the order is reserved.
07

Tracking the Order Under Section 75

Then, we track the issue of the order, watch for the Section 75(10) outer limit, and review the order in Form GST DRC-07 against the Section 75 safeguards, especially the ban on enlarging the demand and the requirement of a reasoned order. Hence, defects on the face of the order are identified at once.
08

Advising on Pay, Rectify, or Appeal

Finally, we advise the business on the next step — paying the confirmed demand, seeking rectification for an apparent error, or filing an appeal to the First Appellate Authority. Hence, the engagement ends at a clean, defensible next step, not at the order alone.

After the Adjudication Order: Pay, Rectify, or Appeal

Every adjudication order leaves the business with one of three real choices. We advise on the right route based on the legal merits, the amounts at stake, and the wider compliance picture.

Pay & Close the Matter

Pay the confirmed tax, interest, and penalty and close the matter. Under Section 73 and Section 74 of the CGST Act 2017, an early payment after the order can attract reduced penalty exposure.

Seek Rectification

Seek rectification of an apparent error on the face of the order through the same adjudicating authority — the fastest route where the defect is clear.

File a First Appeal

File an appeal to the First Appellate Authority within the prescribed time, with the required pre-deposit, and continue the dispute — onward to the Tribunal where the matter travels further.

Our Appeal at GSTAT service covers the second appeal stage where the dispute travels further.

Common Issues That Arise in GST Adjudication

A few recurring problems account for most defects in GST adjudication orders. Anticipating them shapes both the hearing strategy and the post-order review.

Personal Hearing Not Granted Properly

A hearing notice at short notice, a single hearing where multiple were warranted, or a hearing held without a meaningful opportunity to be heard undermines Section 75(4). The issue is raised on the record and forms part of any later challenge.

Order Going Beyond the Scope of the SCN

An order that confirms an amount larger than the show cause notice or rests on grounds outside the notice directly engages Section 75(7) and Section 75(8). Such an order is reviewed carefully and challenged on these specific grounds.

Order Lacking Reasoning Under Section 75(6)

Some orders dismiss the taxpayer's contentions without setting out reasons or without dealing with the documents on record, falling short of the reasoned-order requirement under Section 75(6). The absence of reasoning is highlighted in the appellate forum.

Wrong Section Invoked: 74 Instead of 73

Where Section 74 has been invoked without the facts that allegations of fraud, suppression, or wilful misstatement require, the reclassification from Section 74 to Section 73 becomes a substantive issue. Our team raises this point during the hearing and on the record.

Adjournment Refused Despite Reasonable Cause

Where a reasonable cause has been shown but an adjournment is refused, the safeguard of Section 75(5) can be raised on the record. The refusal is documented and the resulting order can be challenged on a denial-of-opportunity ground.

Demand Confirmed Without Considering Evidence

An order that confirms the demand without engaging with the documents and reconciliations on record is defective. We build the hearing record so every key document is acknowledged; our GSTR-2B reconciliation work covers the input tax credit side.

Consequences of a Confirmed Adverse Adjudication Order

A confirmed adverse order is not a one-time event. The cost of a poorly handled adjudication carries well beyond the proceeding itself.

1

Confirmed tax demand with interest — the order confirms the disputed tax along with interest from the original due date.

2

Penalty under Section 73 or Section 74 — penalty as prescribed under the section invoked stands confirmed by the order.

3

Recovery proceedings — a confirmed demand can move into recovery under Section 79 of the CGST Act 2017, including bank attachment.

4

Input tax credit denial — credit found ineligible is denied or reversed, with the corresponding tax payable in cash.

5

Pre-deposit and appeal cost — any first appeal will require the prescribed pre-deposit, which the business must fund alongside the dispute.

Common GST Adjudication Scenarios

Our practice covers every realistic adjudication profile. The approach changes with the issues, the section invoked, and the size of the demand.

Business preparing for the first personal hearing after filing a DRC-06 reply to a Section 73 show cause notice.
Manufacturer with a complex input tax credit issue requiring an oral walk-through at the hearing.
Exporter defending a refund-related demand at the adjudication stage.
Multi-State business attending parallel hearings across different GST jurisdictions for the same issue.
Business invoking Section 75(7) where the proposed order appears to exceed the show cause notice.
Business seeking adjournment under Section 75(5) on genuine and documented grounds.
Business challenging the Section 74 characterisation of a notice at the hearing itself.
Business reviewing a recently received order in Form GST DRC-07 against the Section 75 safeguards.
Business with a remanded matter back before the adjudicating authority under Section 75(3).
Business invoking the Section 75(10) deemed conclusion where the order has not been passed within the prescribed time.

Businesses We Represent in GST Adjudication

Our GST adjudication practice spans every business profile that goes through a personal hearing. We tailor every engagement to the issues and the size of the matter.

Businesses preparing for, or already attending, personal hearings before the adjudicating authority.
Manufacturers, traders, exporters, and service providers with complex factual records.
Multi-State businesses managing adjudication in more than one jurisdiction.
Companies escalating from scrutiny, audit, or assessment into formal adjudication.
High-input-tax-credit businesses defending credit on the merits.
Companies, LLPs, partnership firms, and proprietorships across Mumbai, Pune, and pan-India.

Why Choose N D Savla & Associates

Businesses choose our practice for five reasons rooted in real delivery.

1

Qualified Chartered Accountants lead every adjudication, so the matter is handled with technical depth and a clear view of Section 75 of the CGST Act 2017.

2

We prepare the hearing file, the issue brief, and the spokesperson so the personal hearing is presented as a connected story rather than a heap of papers.

3

We treat the Section 75 safeguards as a working checklist throughout, from the request for hearing to the review of the order.

4

Our work moves seamlessly from SCN handling into adjudication and onward to rectification or appeal, so the matter is not handed off between providers at every step.

5

Strong Mumbai and Pune expertise, serving clients pan-India, and we connect every adjudication with forward compliance so the same issue does not return.

Our Wider GST & Indirect-Tax Practice

Our wider GST and indirect-tax practice covers the full dispute arc, from the first notice to the second appeal.

Common Questions on GST Adjudication

What is adjudication under GST?
Adjudication under GST is the process by which a proper officer, after issuing a show cause notice and considering the taxpayer's reply, hears the matter in person and passes a reasoned order determining the tax, interest, and penalty payable. It is a quasi-judicial step within the GST department, governed by Section 73, Section 74, and Section 75 of the CGST Act 2017. The order is summarised in Form GST DRC-07 and becomes the basis on which the dispute either closes or is taken up in appeal. Our SCN handling page covers the earlier reply stage.
Who is the adjudicating authority in GST?
Under Section 2(4) of the CGST Act 2017, the adjudicating authority is any authority appointed or authorised to pass an order or decision under the Act, other than the Board, the First Appellate Authority, the Revisional Authority, and the GST Appellate Tribunal. In a typical demand and SCN matter, the adjudicating authority is the proper officer who issued the notice or another officer authorised for that level of demand. The officer functions in a quasi-judicial role at the adjudication stage. Our GST consultancy services page covers end-to-end GST support.
Is a personal hearing compulsory in GST adjudication?
Yes, in substance. Under Section 75(4) of the CGST Act 2017, a personal hearing must be granted where the taxpayer requests it in writing or where an adverse order is contemplated. The personal hearing is therefore a statutory right, not a courtesy. Skipping the hearing or holding it in form rather than substance weakens the record and is itself a ground that can be raised in any later challenge. Our GST appeal services page covers appeals against adverse orders.
How many adjournments can be sought in GST adjudication?
Under Section 75(5) of the CGST Act 2017, the adjudicating authority can grant a maximum of three adjournments during the personal hearing, on reasonable cause being shown by the taxpayer. Therefore, adjournments are not unlimited and should not be used routinely; they should be reserved for genuine reasons such as a need to compile additional records or a verifiable conflict on the hearing date. Each adjournment, with its grounds, becomes part of the record. Our GST audit and assessment support page covers related procedural support.
Can the adjudication order go beyond the SCN?
No. Under Section 75(7) of the CGST Act 2017, the tax, interest, and penalty confirmed in the order cannot exceed the amount specified in the show cause notice. Further, under Section 75(8), the demand cannot be confirmed on grounds other than those specified in the notice. Therefore, an order that enlarges the demand or rests on a new ground falls foul of the Act and is a strong basis for rectification or appeal. Our GST rectification and review support page covers rectification of orders.
What is the time limit for passing the adjudication order?
The time limit for passing the adjudication order is built into Section 73 and Section 74 of the CGST Act 2017, measured from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Section 75(10) backs this up by deeming the adjudication to be concluded if no order is passed within the prescribed period. Therefore, the limitation must be tracked for each matter and is itself a ground that can be raised where the order is delayed beyond the statutory window. Our appeal at GSTAT page covers the second appeal stage.
What are the options after an adverse adjudication order?
After an adverse adjudication order, the business has three real options. The first is to pay the confirmed tax, interest, and penalty and close the matter; an early payment after the order can attract a reduced penalty under Section 74. The second is to seek rectification of an apparent error on the face of the order from the same adjudicating authority. The third is to file a first appeal to the Appellate Authority within the prescribed time, with the required pre-deposit, and continue the dispute, and onward to the GST Appellate Tribunal where necessary. Our CA for GST appeal page covers the appeal route.

Published by the Indirect-Tax Practice of N D Savla & Associates

NDS

N D Savla & AssociatesChartered Accountants · Mumbai, India · Members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI)

This guide is published by the indirect-tax practice of N D Savla & Associates, a Chartered Accountancy firm based in Mumbai, India. Our team comprises qualified Chartered Accountants registered with ICAI, holding focused practice in GST adjudication support and Goods and Services Tax compliance under the CGST Act 2017, the IGST Act 2017, the State GST Acts, and the CGST Rules 2017. Our work covers adjudication under Section 73 and Section 74 read with Section 75 of the CGST Act 2017 — including the right to a personal hearing under Section 75(4), the three-adjournment limit under Section 75(5), the reasoned-order requirement under Section 75(6), the bar on enlarging the demand or grounds under Sections 75(7) and 75(8), the limitation under Section 75(10), the re-determination route under Section 75(2), the fresh order on remand under Section 75(3), and the single-penalty rule under Section 75(13). We also handle SCN handling, scrutiny, assessment, rectification, first appeals before the Appellate Authority, and second appeals before the GST Appellate Tribunal. Our office serves manufacturers, traders, exporters, service providers, companies, LLPs, partnership firms, and proprietorships across Mumbai, Pune, and pan-India.

Facing a GST Personal Hearing? Talk to Our GST Team.

End-to-end GST adjudication representation for businesses, manufacturers, traders, exporters, service providers, and multi-State registrants — review of the SCN, reply, and record, hearing file and issue brief preparation, representation at the personal hearing before the adjudicating authority, order tracking under Section 75, Form GST DRC-07 review, and advice on payment, rectification, or appeal. The personal hearing is the last chance to settle a GST matter before it moves into the appeal cycle, so it deserves the same discipline as a formal oral argument.

Get in Touch
+91 98190 00511  ·  +91 91670 58000  ·  +91 98190 00445
nainitsavla@savlagroup.in  ·  N D Savla & Associates, Mumbai