Call For Business Enquiries : +91 97650 00966 / +91 98190 00511 / +91 98218 32683

CMA Data Preparation for Bank Loan | CA Firm in Mumbai
Bank Finance

CMA Data Preparation
For Bank Loan and Working Capital Finance

Seven-statement CMA format, operating cycle and holding period analysis, working capital gap and MPBF computation, fund flow and ratio analysis — prepared in your lender’s template and defended through the appraisal.

What Is CMA Data?

CMA data is the document your banker actually reads. The rest of the loan file is supporting paper; the credit monitoring arrangement statements are where the assessment is made, where your working capital limit is computed, and where an inconsistency will send the whole application back to you.

This page explains what CMA data is, what the seven statements contain, who needs it, how the preparation process runs, and how the assessment changes across four types of business. If your file has been returned once already, the section on common rejection causes is the place to start.

CMA data stands for credit monitoring arrangement data — a standardised set of financial statements, historical and projected, that banks use to assess a borrower working capital requirement and repayment capacity. It typically covers two years of audited actuals, the current provisional year, and two to three years of projections.

The format originated with the Reserve Bank of India credit monitoring framework and, although the regulatory requirement has evolved considerably, the structure has persisted because banks find it workable. Most Indian banks still use substantially the same seven statements, with minor variations in their own templates.

What makes CMA data different from ordinary financial statements is that it is forward-looking and formula-driven. The bank does not simply read your projections; it computes your permissible finance from your own numbers using its own norms. Which means the assumptions you put in determine the limit you get out.

N D Savla & Associates prepares CMA data for working capital facilities, cash credit limits, overdraft enhancements and term loan applications across banks and NBFCs. We build the projections from your actual operating cycle rather than reverse-engineering them from the limit you want, which is why the files hold up under credit team questioning. Where a new project needs a full appraisal document instead, that is covered by our project report preparation service.

What Are the Seven Statements in CMA Data?

The standard format runs to seven linked statements. Each feeds the next, so an error in one propagates through all of them.

StatementWhat It CoversWhat the Banker Looks For
Form I — Existing and proposed limitsCurrent facilities from all lenders and the limits now soughtUndisclosed borrowings and total exposure
Form II — Operating statementSales, cost, profitability for two actual and three projected yearsWhether the sales growth assumption is credible
Form III — Analysis of balance sheetAssets and liabilities classified over the same five-year spanTrend in current assets and outside liabilities
Form IV — Comparative current assets and liabilitiesDetailed break-up of working capital componentsHolding periods for stock, debtors and creditors
Form V — Computation of MPBFWorking capital gap and permissible bank financeWhether the requested limit exceeds the computed entitlement
Form VI — Fund flow statementSources and application of funds year on yearWhether long-term funds are financing long-term assets
Form VII — Ratio analysisCurrent ratio, TOL/TNW, DSCR, turnover ratiosCompliance with the bank internal benchmarks

Note: the working capital gap is current assets less current liabilities other than bank borrowings. Under the commonly applied second method of lending, the borrower must fund at least 25 percent of current assets from long-term sources, which is what produces a current ratio benchmark of 1.33.

Who Needs CMA Data?

Any borrower seeking or renewing a working capital facility above the threshold their bank applies — which for most banks means anything beyond a small, fully collateralised limit.

Businesses Applying for a New Cash Credit or Overdraft Limit

A first-time working capital application is assessed almost entirely on the CMA data, because the bank has no borrowing history with you. The holding period assumptions for inventory, receivables and creditors have to be defensible against your own audited accounts, since the credit team will compute them independently and compare.

Existing Borrowers at Annual Renewal

Working capital limits are renewed annually and the renewal file requires fresh CMA data with updated actuals. This is where most disputes arise: last year projections are now visible as actuals, and a large gap between the two undermines the credibility of the new projections. Businesses with disciplined monthly financial reporting and MIS handle renewals far more smoothly because the numbers were tracked all year.

Companies Seeking Limit Enhancement

An enhancement request has to demonstrate that the increased limit is justified by the operating cycle rather than by a cash shortfall. The CMA data must show growth in sales and a corresponding growth in the working capital gap. Where the real problem is stretched creditors or slow collections, the enhancement is usually declined and the underlying issue flagged instead.

Borrowers Refinancing or Shifting Banks

Moving facilities to another lender requires a full fresh appraisal, and the new bank will compare your CMA projections against your filed returns and audited accounts closely. Provisional figures for the current year usually need to be supported by provisional financial statements or certified financial statements from a chartered accountant.

How Has Working Capital Assessment Evolved in India?

The way Indian banks assess working capital has changed fundamentally over five decades, and understanding the sequence explains why the CMA format looks the way it does.

1974 to 1979

The Tandon and Chore Committees

The Tandon Committee reported in 1974 and established the framework that still shapes the assessment: norms for inventory and receivable holding periods by industry, the concept of the working capital gap, and three methods of lending under which the borrower funds a progressively larger share of current assets. The Chore Committee followed in 1979, pushing borrowers toward the second method and reducing dependence on cash credit by requiring a portion to be taken as a working capital demand loan.

1991 onwards

Liberalisation and the Nayak Committee

The Nayak Committee reported in 1991 and simplified assessment for smaller units through the turnover method, under which working capital finance is computed as a percentage of projected annual turnover. This remains in use for small borrowers. Liberalisation itself changed the underlying problem: with volume and price no longer administered, projected sales became a genuine estimate rather than a licensed entitlement.

1997 and after

Banks get discretion

The Reserve Bank withdrew the mandatory maximum permissible bank finance formula in 1997, leaving banks free to set their own assessment methods. In practice most retained the Tandon framework because it worked, but the consequence for borrowers was significant: the numbers were no longer prescribed by regulation, so the borrower now had to argue their own case. The MSMED Act, 2006 later added statutory payment terms that constrain how far creditor days can be stretched in a projection.

Where things stand now

Projections are verified before they are read

GST from July 2017 gave banks an independent monthly record of sales that can be checked against any projection, and account aggregator frameworks have made bank statement analysis instant. Credit teams now verify projected turnover against filed GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B before the file reaches a sanctioning authority. The practical effect is that optimistic sales projections are detected immediately, and the credibility cost of submitting them falls on every subsequent application.

How Do We Prepare CMA Data?

Our preparation runs in eight steps and typically takes seven to fifteen working days, depending on how complete the underlying records are.

01

Document Collection and Verification

We gather audited financials for the last two years, provisional figures for the current year, GST returns, bank statements for all existing facilities, sanction letters and the latest stock and debtor statements. Nothing is projected until the base is verified.
02

Analysis of the Actual Operating Cycle

We compute your real holding periods — inventory days, debtor days, creditor days and the resulting cash conversion cycle — from the audited accounts rather than from assumption. This is the foundation of the entire assessment.
03

Sales Projection Build

Turnover is projected from order book, capacity, historical trend and market conditions, then sense-checked against GST turnover already filed. Projections that cannot be reconciled to filed returns are the single most common reason a file is questioned.
04

Cost Structure and Profitability Projection

Direct costs, overheads, interest and depreciation are projected line by line, with the interest computation reflecting the facilities actually being sought. Profitability has to be plausible against the historical trend, since a sudden margin jump invites scrutiny.
Form II — Operating statement
05

Working Capital Gap and MPBF Computation

Current assets and current liabilities are projected using the holding periods established in step two, the working capital gap is computed, and permissible bank finance is derived under the method the lender applies. This determines the limit that can realistically be sought.
Form V — MPBF
06

Fund Flow and Ratio Analysis

We prepare the fund flow statement and the full ratio set — current ratio, total outside liabilities to tangible net worth, debt service coverage, and the turnover ratios — and check each against the benchmarks the lender uses.
Forms VI & VII
07

Internal Review Against the Lender Template

Every bank has minor format variations. We prepare in the specific lender template, run a consistency check across all seven statements, and confirm the figures tie back to the audited accounts and GST filings.
08

Submission Support and Query Response

We provide the completed CMA data with a covering note explaining the key assumptions, and respond directly to credit team queries during appraisal, which is where files most often stall.

The projections in CMA data should not be a standalone exercise. Where a client maintains a proper annual budget and rolling forecast or a driver-based financial model, the CMA figures are drawn from those rather than invented for the application, which makes them far easier to defend.

Before you submit

The four most common causes of CMA data rejection are projected turnover that cannot be reconciled to GST returns, a current ratio below 1.33 without explanation, undisclosed borrowings from other lenders, and holding period assumptions that contradict the audited accounts. All four are avoidable before submission.

How Does Working Capital Assessment Differ by Sector?

The seven statements are the same for everyone. What differs is which line the credit team interrogates.

Manufacturing Units

Inventory dominates the assessment — raw material, work in progress and finished goods each carry their own holding period, and the norms differ sharply by industry. Consumption of power and fuel relative to production is checked as a plausibility test on the turnover projection. Creditor days cannot be extended freely, since Section 15 of the MSMED Act, 2006 requires payment to MSME suppliers within forty-five days and interest on delay is disallowed under the Income-tax Act.

Trading and Distribution Businesses

Assessment focuses on stock turnover and debtor quality, since these businesses hold little fixed asset security. Margins are thin, so a small error in the projected gross margin materially changes the profitability shown. Banks look closely at concentration — a distributor dependent on one principal or a handful of customers is assessed more conservatively regardless of the numbers.

Service Businesses and Contractors

With minimal inventory, the working capital gap is driven almost entirely by receivables and work in progress. For contractors, retention money and unbilled revenue are examined carefully because both are slow-realising and frequently overstated as current assets. Banks often apply the turnover method here rather than a full holding-period build.

Exporters and Import-Dependent Businesses

Export borrowers deal with packing credit, post-shipment finance and foreign currency limits, so the CMA data must separate the rupee and foreign currency components. Import-dependent units are assessed on letter of credit usage and the timing gap between import payment and domestic collection, which can stretch the operating cycle well beyond what the domestic sales figure suggests.

Why Choose N D Savla & Associates for CMA Data?

These are the five reasons clients give for having us prepare the file.

Projections built from your actual operating cycle

We compute holding periods from the audited accounts rather than working backwards from the limit you want, which is why credit teams can verify the numbers instead of challenging them.

Reconciled to GST and income tax filings before submission

Every projected turnover figure is checked against what has already been filed, removing the most common cause of a returned file.

Prepared in the specific lender format

Bank templates vary in detail, and a file submitted in the wrong format is delayed before anyone reads the content.

Realistic advice on what you can actually get

If the computed permissible finance falls short of what you need, we say so before submission and discuss the alternatives rather than submitting a request that will be cut.

Support through the appraisal, not just at submission

We answer credit team queries directly, which is where most working capital files lose weeks.

Where assessment norms, priority sector classification or facility structuring are in question, we work from the master directions and circulars published by the Reserve Bank of India at rbi.org.in, so the file reflects the current framework rather than dated practice.

Frequently Asked Questions About CMA Data

What is CMA data and why do banks ask for it?
CMA data is a standardised set of seven financial statements — historical and projected — that banks use to assess how much working capital finance a borrower genuinely needs and can service. It covers two years of audited actuals, the current provisional year and two to three projected years. Banks require it because it lets them compute the permissible limit from your own operating cycle using their own norms, rather than relying on the amount you have requested.
What documents are required to prepare CMA data?
Audited financial statements for the last two years, provisional financials for the current year, income tax returns, GST returns for the period, bank statements for all existing accounts, existing sanction letters from every lender, the latest stock and debtor statements, and details of the facility now being sought. For companies, the MOA, AOA and shareholding pattern are usually needed as well.
How long does CMA data preparation take?
Seven to fifteen working days in most cases, provided the audited accounts are finalised and the supporting records are available. Where the current year books are incomplete or reconciliations are pending, preparation cannot begin until that is resolved, and this is usually what delays a file rather than the CMA work itself.
What is MPBF and how is it calculated?
Maximum permissible bank finance is the working capital limit a bank will consider based on the borrower operating cycle. Under the commonly applied second method of lending, the working capital gap is computed as current assets less current liabilities other than bank borrowings, and the borrower is expected to contribute at least twenty-five percent of current assets from long-term sources. The balance represents the permissible bank finance. Smaller borrowers are often assessed instead under the turnover method as a percentage of projected sales.
Why do banks reject CMA data?
Most commonly because projected turnover cannot be reconciled to GST returns already filed, the current ratio falls below the benchmark without explanation, borrowings from other lenders were not disclosed in Form I, or the holding periods used in the projections contradict what the audited accounts show. Every one of these is identifiable before submission, which is precisely why the review step matters more than the drafting.

Talk to a CMA Data Consultant in Mumbai

Send us your last two audited balance sheets and your existing sanction letters. We will tell you what limit your operating cycle actually supports before you file anything.

Speak to N D Savla & Associates
OfficeSuit No.102, L1, Ashok Premises, Nicholas Road, Andheri East, Mumbai 400069
Office HoursMonday to Saturday
10:00 AM – 7:00 PM